When a study combines a drug with therapy but doesn't include a comparison group (some people getting only the drug, only the therapy, or neither), there's no way to know which part is helping. Neuroscientists and clinical researchers are expected to point this out publicly, calling for a study that properly isolates each element. Without that, no one — including regulators — can responsibly recommend the combined treatment.
You cannot attribute adjunctive benefit without randomization and a comparator arm. The neuroscience community will flag this confound rapidly.
Join our community — a free weekly Zoom circle with a master facilitator. Come sit with us first; the rest reveals itself.
Join the Free Weekly Circle →